Travel at Own Risk; Emirates, Qantas Differ on Flying over Iraq Warzone; Emirates Reroutes, Qantas Pushes On
By Esther Tanquintic-Misa | July 29, 2014 2:04 PM EST
A Boeing 777-F aircraft of German Lufthansa Cargo air carrier stands on the tarmac during loading at Fraport airport in Frankfurt July 28, 2014. Today Lufthansa transports 66 horses to Tehran airport. REUTERS/Ralph Orlowski (GERMANY - Tags: ANIMALS TRANSPORT)
Claiming that the fate of Malaysia Airlines MH17 altered as to how global aviation should conduct its flights, Emirates said it will no longer fly over Iraq due to the threat posed by Islamist militants.
"The horrors that this created was a kick in the solar plexus for all of us. We cannot continue to say, 'well it's a political thing'. We have to do something. We have to take the bull by the horns," Sir Tim Clarke, president of Emirates, told The Times.
"The fact of the matter is MH17 changed everything," he added.
But for Qantas, its' rally is fear not. Or perhaps for passengers, travel at your own risk?
"There is no suggestion that flying over Iraq is unsafe for commercial airlines, particularly given the cruising altitude that most, including Qantas, maintain," an unidentified Qantas spokesperson told Fairfax Media.
As it avoids Iraqi airspace, Emirates will instead traverse either across Iran and then into Turkish airspace, or across Saudi Arabia and the Red Sea over Cairo and then into European airspace.
Emirates decision not to fly over Iraqi airspace will occur within the next seven to ten days due to concerns about missile strikes following the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17.
These changes will expectedly add an extra 45 minutes to journey times as well as hike up staff and fuel costs for the airline.
Hundreds of flights pass over Iraq daily, including British Airways, Emirates, Air France and Lufthansa.
Meanwhile, world aviation officials will be holding an emergency meeting in Canada on Wednesday to discuss the risks of commercial airlines flying over war zones.
The meeting was spurred by the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 in eastern Ukraine.
John Goglia, aviation safety expert and former US National Transport Safety board member, maintained the security of any nation's travelling aeroplane and its passengers basically lie on the global governments.
"There does need to be a single entity to keep everyone advised and it really needs to be governments because some of the information is provided ... by interesting sources," ABC News quoted Goglia said.
"Governments are going to have to step up to the plate and provide information to the airlines."
To report problems or to leave feedback about this article, e-mail:
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
Join the Conversation
- Vatican 2014 Final Synod Report: Gays Still ‘Unwelcome’ in Catholic Church, LGBT Thankful for First Step
- The Pirate Bay Blockade: Cost Of Blocking Websites Like TPB Is Ridiculously High
- New Zealand Losing $9.4 Billion Every Year to Fraud
- 5 Cities With The Highest Cost Of Living In 2014
- Ebola ‘Cruise Ship’: Holidaymakers Furious Organisers Hid the Truth About Dallas Health Care Worker
- Galaxy Note 4 vs Redmi Note 2 vs iPhone 6: Samsung in Danger with Depressing Q3
- iOS 8 Jailbreak Release Date Likely this October 2014 with Pangu not Evad3rs Firming Up as Creator
- Top 4 Free-To-Download Apps for Fuller iPhone 6, 6 Plus Experience
- Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock Set to Soar Beyond $100 Despite Decline After New iPad Launch
- Russia Beefs Up Gold Reserves To Offset Heat of Sanctions And Undercut Dollar
- Australia's 'No Way' Anti-Asylum Seeker Poster Sparks Outrage