Travel at Own Risk; Emirates, Qantas Differ on Flying over Iraq Warzone; Emirates Reroutes, Qantas Pushes On
By Esther Tanquintic-Misa | July 29, 2014 2:04 PM EST
A Boeing 777-F aircraft of German Lufthansa Cargo air carrier stands on the tarmac during loading at Fraport airport in Frankfurt July 28, 2014. Today Lufthansa transports 66 horses to Tehran airport. REUTERS/Ralph Orlowski (GERMANY - Tags: ANIMALS TRANSPORT)
Claiming that the fate of Malaysia Airlines MH17 altered as to how global aviation should conduct its flights, Emirates said it will no longer fly over Iraq due to the threat posed by Islamist militants.
"The horrors that this created was a kick in the solar plexus for all of us. We cannot continue to say, 'well it's a political thing'. We have to do something. We have to take the bull by the horns," Sir Tim Clarke, president of Emirates, told The Times.
"The fact of the matter is MH17 changed everything," he added.
But for Qantas, its' rally is fear not. Or perhaps for passengers, travel at your own risk?
"There is no suggestion that flying over Iraq is unsafe for commercial airlines, particularly given the cruising altitude that most, including Qantas, maintain," an unidentified Qantas spokesperson told Fairfax Media.
As it avoids Iraqi airspace, Emirates will instead traverse either across Iran and then into Turkish airspace, or across Saudi Arabia and the Red Sea over Cairo and then into European airspace.
Emirates decision not to fly over Iraqi airspace will occur within the next seven to ten days due to concerns about missile strikes following the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17.
These changes will expectedly add an extra 45 minutes to journey times as well as hike up staff and fuel costs for the airline.
Hundreds of flights pass over Iraq daily, including British Airways, Emirates, Air France and Lufthansa.
Meanwhile, world aviation officials will be holding an emergency meeting in Canada on Wednesday to discuss the risks of commercial airlines flying over war zones.
The meeting was spurred by the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 in eastern Ukraine.
John Goglia, aviation safety expert and former US National Transport Safety board member, maintained the security of any nation's travelling aeroplane and its passengers basically lie on the global governments.
"There does need to be a single entity to keep everyone advised and it really needs to be governments because some of the information is provided ... by interesting sources," ABC News quoted Goglia said.
"Governments are going to have to step up to the plate and provide information to the airlines."
To report problems or to leave feedback about this article, e-mail:
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Still The World Champions: Team USA Overpowers Serbia, 129-92 To Win 2014 FIBA World Cup [PHOTOS]
- Pope Francis: World War III Has Started On Piecemeal
- After Win Over Maidana, Mayweather Says He Is Prepared To Negotiate A Fight With Pacquiao
- From Fat To Fit: Celebrities Who Were Overweight Before They Became The Beauties That They Are
Join the Conversation
- iPhone 6 vs iPhone 6 Plus vs Galaxy S5 and HTC One M8: Performance, CPU and Health
- Google Release Roundup: Nexus 5 2014, Nexus 6, Nexus 8 and Android L Killer Features
- Samsung Attacks iPhone 6 Plus Through New Galaxy Note 4 Commercial: Apple Claims Imitating Galaxy Note Phablets
- iPhone 6 And IPhone 6 Plus Sold Out, New Stocks To Arrive In October
- Moto G (Gen 2) vs. Xiaomi Redmi 1S—Specifications, Features And Price Showdown
- Nexus 6, 8 Release Dates Imminent as Moto X Pre-Order Begins & Nexus 7 Deals Ramp Up
- Pregnant Kate Middleton May Call Off Malta Trip Due To Sickness: Royal Couple Will Move To Anmer Hall Residence