Australia Admits Having 153 Tamil Asylum Seekers in Custody
By Sounak Mukhopadhyay | July 9, 2014 9:00 AM EST
Sri Lankan asylum seekers who were sent back by Australia cover their faces as they wait to enter a magistrate's court in the southern port district of Galle July 8, 2014. The 41 asylum seekers handed over on Sunday appeared before a magistrate's court in the port city of Galle on Tuesday. Sri Lankan police had said they were to be charged with leaving the country illegally and any found guilty would face "rigorous imprisonment", raising fears about rights abuses.
The people Australia is holding back are reportedly Tamils who set off their journey on a 72-foot boat from Pondicherry in India during the mid-part of June. There are children among the group of people whose families have now started getting worried as they did not hear from them for over a week now. They will apparently be in "very big trouble" if Australia sent them back to Sri Lanka.
It was only on Tuesday, July 8 that the Australian government accepted holding back the alleged asylum seekers. It did not comment on the issue as it neither denied nor confirmed it. Australia is free not to discuss any issue in public that falls under "Operation Sovereign Borders," a military campaign which was launched in September 2013 to prevent "boats" from dropping outsiders in the country. The policy has turned out to be a controversial one as critics often call it cruel.
Australia had handed over 41 asylum seekers earlier in June to Sri Lankan authorities who confirmed it on Monday. Those Sri Lankans were accused of illegally departing their home land. Their boat was captured near the Cocos Islands. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees expressed its concern about Australia's denial of accepting refugees.
Lawyers representing 50 asylum seekers sought extension of the 24-hour injunction which would allow Australia to hand them over to Sri Lankan authorities. If they are handed back, they are likely to face persecution in their own country. According to human rights activists, it is not appropriate to evaluate asylum seekers at sea to make judgements about the ones who are generally asked a few questions through video conference to determine if they should be handed over to the authorities of their native country.
Contact the writer: s.mukhopadhyay@IBTimes.com.au
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
Join the Conversation
- Kobani ISIS Fighter Sends Out Desperate Message For Prayers And Support: Euphoria Turns Into Desperation As Kurds Advance
- ISIS War: US Airstrikes Lead to Growing ISIS Support In Syria; Russia Questions Coalition's Policies
- ISIS Uses Hungarian Porn Stills For Propaganda, US State Department Alleges
- New Zealand's Surveillance Laws Are Anti-People, Says Green Party leader Russel Norman
- China Is Building An Island In The Spratly Islands—Report
- Russia's New Tactical Nuclear Weapons Program Growing Confident Against the US: Talks of World War III
- Apple and Google Engage in Thermonuclear War, New Google Translate Chat App in the Works
- Chris Algieri’s Battered Face Trends On Social Media
- Walmart Offers the Best 2014 Black Friday Deals on iPhone 6, iPad Ai2 & Other Gadgets – Reports
- Highest Paid NBA Players 2014: NBA Stars Who Earn More Than LeBron James
- Home Depot Early Black Friday 2014 Sale Up To Nov. 29, 2014 Includes Special Buys On Appliances Such As Samsung Refrigerators, Whirlpool Electric Ranges And Hoover Vacuum Cleaners