Netizens React on Twitter Over Ethics of Facebook's Social Experiment, COO Issues Apology
By Ma Evelyn Castino Quilas | July 3, 2014 12:35 PM EST
Netizens have reacted on the social media Twitter over Facebook's social experiment testing whether emotional contagion occurs outside of in-person interaction between individuals by reducing the amount of emotional content in the News Feed.
A man is silhouetted against a video screen with an Facebook logo as he poses with an Dell laptop in this photo illustration taken in the central Bosnian town of Zenica in this August 14, 2013 fiel photo. Facebook Inc's website appeared to be back up on Thursday a few minutes after it displayed a message saying "Sorry, something went wrong". The outage was reported in several countries, including China, Singapore and India.
According to the study published in PNAS, the social media giant manipulated the extent of exposure to emotional expressions in the Newsfeed among almost 700,000 people.
Facebook conducted two parallel experiments: one for positive emotion and one for negative emotion.
In one experiment, the user's exposure to positive emotional content in his newsfeed was reduced. In the other experiment, it was the user's exposure to negative emotional content which was reduced.
Facebook's social experiment revealed that when positive expressions were minimized, social media users posted lesser positive content and posted more negative contents. The opposite pattern holds true when negative expressions were reduced.
The results showed a person's own emotion is influenced by the other user's emotional expressions on Facebook, which constituted a large scale contagion through the social network.
The study also suggested that emotional contagion does not necessarily require in-person interaction and nonverbal cues. It also suggested that observation of positive experiences from other social media users also constituted a positive experience for people.
When netizens learned about the social experiment, they reacted to Twitter by questioning the ethics of the study. One user @dgrobinson said the #FacebookExperiment is a rare public reminder of corporate big data's unaccountable power.
Another user @dhirajmurthy urged the academic community to speak out on (the lack of) research ethics and corporate responsibility in #FacebookExperiment.
"I'm glad I'm not on Facebook. Wonder why psychopa-I mean-army is funding a study of social media?" @holtcie said.
To diffuse the netizen's reactions, Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg issued an apology for the experiment.
"This was part of ongoing research companies do to test different products, and that was what it was; it was poorly communicated. And for that communication we apologize. We never meant to upset you," the COO said in Wall Street Journal.
She stressed Facebook takes privacy and security really seriously because that is something that allows people to share opinions and emotions.
Read the tweets below:
— David Robinson (@dgrobinson) July 2, 2014
Academics! Speak out on (the lack of) research ethics and corporate responsibility in #FacebookExperiment My take: http://t.co/mB7D97besr — dhiraj murthy (@dhirajmurthy) June 30, 2014
— C.D. Holt (@holtcie) June 29, 2014
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Join the Conversation
- Sydney Siege Victim Katrina Dawson Killed by Man Haron Monis, Preliminary Report Suggests
- Sydney Siege Aftermath: Australia's Gun Laws May Be Under Review
- Australian Muslim Says Sorry for Sydney Siege
- Sweden Launches Website To Crack Down On Child Sex Tourists
- Rupert Murdoch Blasted For 'Insensitive' Tweet Over Bloody Outcome of Sydney Siege