Why Google Displaced Apple as the World’s Most Valuable Brand
By Vittorio Hernandez | May 23, 2014 6:57 AM EST
The official explanation of research company Millward Brown, which just declared Google the most valuable company, why Apple was dislodged from the top spot is linked to their brand values.
Apple's brand value decreased by 20 per cent to $148 million, while Google's brand value zoomed 40 per cent to $159 billion.
Peter Walshe, Milward Brown's Global BrandZ director, gave a cryptic explanation to the Telegraph, quoted by CNET. His answer was: "To gain more of our mind-space brands such as Google are making ambitious plays across existing category boundaries."
What he meant, according to CNET, is that among the new products of Google are self-driving cars, balloons and glasses, while Apple has phones, tablets and PCs, which have been around for quite some time.
But the rankings of Milward Brown to come up with the Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands Report uses also other tools, particularly the Optimor - a proprietary tool with closely guarded components - utilising data from 150,000 interviews with consumers from different parts of the globe.
The firm believes that across all markets, the small number of consumers who comprise a large part of sales or the loyal consumers, have more value to a brand than occasional users. Milward Brown said that frame of mind was a crucial factor when it analysed brand values.
Another confirmation of Google's differentiation from other brands is a report in Techcrunch that the company is planning to offer subsidised, commercial-grade Wi-Fi hardware to small- and medium-sized businesses. The move aims to improve vastly the quality of Wi-Fi experience at smaller enterprises such as doctor's offices, restaurants and gyms.
By providing better Wi-Fi in these smaller businesses, Google hopes to have more users spending on its apps and services even while they are away from the usual places where they access the Internet via Wi-Fi such as at home or in the office. Google also values smaller clients that may not immediately yield big profits, while Apple prefers to concentrate on manufacturing gadgets for the high-end market.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- NFL MNF: Pittsburgh Steelers 30, Houston Texans 23 [PHOTOS]
- 2014 MLB World Series Game 1: San Francisco Giants 7, Kansas City Royals 1 [PHOTOS]
- 2014 MLB World Series - Game 2: Kansas City Royals 7, San Francisco Giants 2 [PHOTOS]
- NFL Thursday Recap - Denver Broncos 35, San Diego Chargers 21: Peyton Manning Has 3 TDs In Easy Win [PHOTOS]
Join the Conversation
- Tesco Facing Crisis After Chairman Quits Citing Accounting Scandal In The Retail Giant
- Australian Federal Court Fines Reebok $350,000 & Orders Refunds For Shoe Endorsed By Miranda Kerr That Claims Unproven Health Benefits
- Sydney Software Firm Bigcommerce Teams Up With Alibaba To Beat Amazon
- Perth Call Centre Staff Bad In English And Not Philippine And Indian Counterparts, Telstra Boss Says
- Xiaomi Redmi 1S vs. Sharp Aquos Crystal – Specifications, Features And Price Showdown
- ASUS Releases A Teaser Indicating The Arrival of New Zenfone and ZenWatch On October 28
- Boy Stoned To Death For Alleged Rape, Victim Receives Dowry From Militants
- Three Dual SIM Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Duos Variants Comes To China
- Russia is Creating Underwater Combat Robots to Protect its Arctic Territories
- ‘Lone Wolf’ Attack on Canada Parliament Hill Could be ISIS-Related
- Android Lollipop 5.0 Confirmed for Nov 3 Rollout as Nexus 6 Global Release Date is Delayed – Reports