Why Google Displaced Apple as the World’s Most Valuable Brand
By Vittorio Hernandez | May 23, 2014 6:57 AM EST
The official explanation of research company Millward Brown, which just declared Google the most valuable company, why Apple was dislodged from the top spot is linked to their brand values.
Apple's brand value decreased by 20 per cent to $148 million, while Google's brand value zoomed 40 per cent to $159 billion.
Peter Walshe, Milward Brown's Global BrandZ director, gave a cryptic explanation to the Telegraph, quoted by CNET. His answer was: "To gain more of our mind-space brands such as Google are making ambitious plays across existing category boundaries."
What he meant, according to CNET, is that among the new products of Google are self-driving cars, balloons and glasses, while Apple has phones, tablets and PCs, which have been around for quite some time.
But the rankings of Milward Brown to come up with the Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands Report uses also other tools, particularly the Optimor - a proprietary tool with closely guarded components - utilising data from 150,000 interviews with consumers from different parts of the globe.
The firm believes that across all markets, the small number of consumers who comprise a large part of sales or the loyal consumers, have more value to a brand than occasional users. Milward Brown said that frame of mind was a crucial factor when it analysed brand values.
Another confirmation of Google's differentiation from other brands is a report in Techcrunch that the company is planning to offer subsidised, commercial-grade Wi-Fi hardware to small- and medium-sized businesses. The move aims to improve vastly the quality of Wi-Fi experience at smaller enterprises such as doctor's offices, restaurants and gyms.
By providing better Wi-Fi in these smaller businesses, Google hopes to have more users spending on its apps and services even while they are away from the usual places where they access the Internet via Wi-Fi such as at home or in the office. Google also values smaller clients that may not immediately yield big profits, while Apple prefers to concentrate on manufacturing gadgets for the high-end market.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Manny Pacquiao Vs. Chris Algieri World Tour Kick Off Press Conference In Macau [PHOTOS]
- Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt Heads to Malta For New Movie After A Whirlwind French Wedding [PHOTOS]
- 2014 US Open Update (Day 4 - Men's Singles): Murray, Djokovic, Raonic and Isner Advance to 3rd Round [PHOTOS]
- Prince Harry & Camilla Thurlow Getting Serious, St. Tropez Holiday Before The Prince’s 30th Birthday [PHOTOS]
Join the Conversation
- Malaysia Airlines to Axe 4,000 Employees, Including CEO; Suspends Trading of Shares
- Floyd Mayweather Gets Investment Advice from Warren Buffett What to Do With Millions
- Former U.S. VP Al Gore Backs Ovo Energy by Investing £8 Million Before IPO
- Study Shows Gap Between What Advisors Say and What Resonates with Investors
- Sept 19 iPhone 6 Release Date Confirmed as Apple Sets Sept 9 iWatch, 2 iPhones Intro - Report
- iPhone 6 Release Date Update: 4.7-Inch Model Scores 65.8% In Screen-To-Size Ratio; A Surprise Entry Scales Top Spot [List Attached]
- Product Recall Alert: Hewlett-Packard Pulls Out 6M Power Cords from US, Canada Over Fire Hazard Concerns, Australia Also Affected
- ISIS Wants $6.6M and Release of Aafia Siddiqui in Exchange of Head of Female US Humanitarian Aid Worker, 1st American Fighting for Jihadis Dead
- Canada Vs Russia War Erupts Via Twitter on Russia-Not Russia Maps
- Ukraine Ceasefire Looks Remote As Putin Talks Tough At Meeting With Poroshenko
- Google Nexus 6 Release May Be the New Google Nexus X Smartphone as New Details Emerge