IPL Corruption Charges: Supreme Court Rejects Srinivasan’s Appeal
By Shruthi SU | April 16, 2014 7:40 PM EST
The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected N Srinivasan's appeal to be reinstated as the BCCI president and stressed that he, along with 12 players, have been named in the Mudgal report.
SC rejected N Srinivasan's appeal to be reinstated as the BCCI president.
The court has also allowed Sundar Raman to continue as the Chief Operating Officer (COO)of the Indian Premier League after Sunil Gavaskar, the interim BCCI president, had written to the court saying he could not decide on Raman. Last month, the SC had asked Gavaskar to make a decision on whether Raman should continue as the COO.
The SC, for the first time, revealed some details of the sealed envelope, submitted by Mudgal committee. It is now understood that Srinivasan has 12 allegations against his name. "It seems that Mr Srinivasan has not taken the allegations seriously," stated Justice AK Patnaik.
On Tuesday, Srinivasan had filed an affidavit, asking the court to reconsider its decision which forced him to step aside as the BCCI president to allow fair probing into the issue.
"I wish to assume office as President, BCCI as there is no reason at all why I should step aside, pending any investigation into any crime being investigated by CB-CID or other agency," Srinivasan said in his affidavit.
In reply, the court clearly stated that Srinivasan will be kept out of the BCCI till any later SC decision overrules it.
"We cannot close our eyes after having come to know about the allegations," said the court. "We don't want to sully anybody's image, but we are also concerned about the game of cricket and to protect it so that it remains clean."
The court also made it clear that no independent agency will be involved in the investigation, since the names involved are highly reputed.
"We are not considering the SIT because we don't want the CBI or the police or the media to throw mud on cricketers," Patnaik said. "Reputations of cricketers and great names are at stake. What happens to the reputation of the players who are representing the country and Indian cricketers of the future. Cricket has to be clean but institutional autonomy has to be maintained."
In addition, the court has asked the BCCI to come up with constructive measures that could include the board itself engaging in fair probing in the profiles of the names mentioned in the Mudgal report.
The court will next hear on 22 April.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Gennady Golovkin Next Fight Options: Canelo Alvarez, Miguel Cotto Or Julio Cesar Chavez Jr.
- NFL MNF: Pittsburgh Steelers 30, Houston Texans 23 [PHOTOS]
- 2014 MLB World Series Game 1: San Francisco Giants 7, Kansas City Royals 1 [PHOTOS]
- 2014 MLB World Series - Game 2: Kansas City Royals 7, San Francisco Giants 2 [PHOTOS]
Join the Conversation
- Manny Pacquiao Blasted For Arrogance, Playing Basketball Month Before Fight Against Chris Algieri
- Ronda Rousey Rejects Idea of Fight Between A Man And A Woman In The UFC
- Manchester United: Did Ed Woodward Really Uttered Expletives During The Red Devils' Draw Against West Brom?
- Chelsea FC: No 'Crying' For The Blues Amid Injury Woes Ahead Of Man Utd Clash, Says Mourinho
- Lamar Odom’s Hope Of Reuniting With Khloe Kardashian Crushed, ‘KUWTK’ Star Reportedly Dating Wiz Khalifa
- No Mercy: ISIS, Father Stones to Death Daughter for Alleged Adultery
- iOS 8 Jailbreak Release Date is Doomed as Team Evad3rs Opts Out, Pangu Hits Snag – Report
- Google Nexus 6 vs. iPhone 5S: 4 Important Things to Consider Before Switching to Android Lollipop
- Swedish Military Spots ‘Russian Submarine’ Off Stockholm Coast, An Alarming ‘Security Game Changer’
- Canada Raises National Terror Alert Level after Suspected Jihadist Runs Over Soldier
- Boy Stoned To Death For Alleged Rape, Victim Receives Dowry From Militants
- Galaxy Note 4: Best Big-Screen Phone, Says Samsung; Analysts Believe Note 4 Unlikely To Beat iPhone 6 Plus [Watch Video]