Aussie CEOs Are Misleading Shareholders, According to ISS
By Athena Yenko | March 20, 2014 1:54 PM EST
CEOs of Australia's top companies are misleading shareholders, an ISS report suggests.
According to a recent report from International Social Service (ISS), big-wigs of the biggest companies in Australia are being compensated in excess of what they divulge through their companies' annual reports. With this, share plans are discreetly augmenting their take-home pay by more than $1 million.
ISS explained that as an end result of large companies pre-planning of long-term bonuses for the CEOs, there are "materially higher payouts" given to higher-ups than what was indicated by the "sticker price" of their award.
"In some cases, the aggregate value of awards at the point of vesting are worth millions of dollars more than initially intended. This has the potential to mislead shareholders," ISS said.
As a rule of thumb, shareholders have their say on executive's compensation as being decided through votes during annual general meeting. However, ISS noted that companies compute their long-term incentive schemes with such convolution that shareholders lost it somewhere along the way.
ISS said that CEOs from eight companies within the ASX top 50 were compensated an excess of $1million within a three-year span because of how long-term bonuses were calculated.
"This is primarily driven by the predetermined modelling assumptions applied to valuing awards on the date of grant,'' ISS said.
The report mentioned former BHP Billiton boss Marius Kloppers and ANZ Chief Executive Mike Smith as two of the most benefited CEOs of the pre-planning scheme. According to ISS, they were paid $9 million and $3.4 million in excess within a five-year period, more than what their targeted pays.
In line with the 2010 Productivity Commission's policy to disclose the actual value of executive bonuses during compensation reports for shareholders, companies are expected to observe transparency. There had also been a call to change the pre-planning scheme of long term bonuses in order to reflect actual amount of shares.
Transparency aside, boards should address the issue without having to regulate the amount of compensation that CEOs receive, said John Egan, a principal at Egan Associates and Fellow at the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
"If you want to pay executives fair value... tell shareholders, don't hide it in accounting,'' he said.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- 2014 MLB World Series Game 1: San Francisco Giants 7, Kansas City Royals 1 [PHOTOS]
- 2014 MLB World Series - Game 2: Kansas City Royals 7, San Francisco Giants 2 [PHOTOS]
- 2014 MLB World Series Game 3: Kansas City Royals 3, San Francisco Giants 2 [PHOTOS]
Join the Conversation
- Tesco Facing Crisis After Chairman Quits Citing Accounting Scandal In The Retail Giant
- #Snapgate: iPad Air 2 Breaks While Undergoing Bend Test
- Australian Federal Court Fines Reebok $350,000 & Orders Refunds For Shoe Endorsed By Miranda Kerr That Claims Unproven Health Benefits
- Perth Call Centre Staff Bad In English And Not Philippine And Indian Counterparts, Telstra Boss Says
- Xiaomi Redmi 1S vs. Sharp Aquos Crystal – Specifications, Features And Price Showdown
- Verizon Motorola Droid Turbo Leaked Live Images Surfaces, Scheduled To Get Unveiled On Oct 28
- Update HTC One M7 with LG G2 with Android 4.4.2 as Sprint OTA: Fixes and Installation
- U.S. Targets Buyers of ISIS Oil, Threatens Sanctions
- ISIS Syria Airstrike Bombing Has Killed 550 People, Civilians Included
- Russia Blocking OSCE Monitoring Of Its Border With Ukraine
- Russia Slams US 'Double Standards' In The Fight Against ISIS