The Patent War: Apple vs. Samsung - Samsung can take a breather
By Pavithra Rathinavel | March 10, 2014 3:09 PM EST
Apple was looking to capitalize a permanent ban on Samsung products due to the patent infringements. According to Reuters, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh, ruled that Apple had not presented enough evidence to show that its patented features were a significant enough driver of consumer demand to warrant an injunction.
Apple IPhone 4s and Samsung Galaxy S
Apple hoped to get a ban on 23 different Samsung's devices, but the irony is that most of the models have already been discontinued by Samsung. Apple and Samsung have been involved in this legal tussle for nearly three years over various Smartphone features patented by Apple. Hence this win is a home run for Samsung.
In a statement, Samsung said it was pleased with the ruling. "We agree with its observation that a few software features alone don't drive consumer demand for Samsung products - rather consumers value a multitude of features," the company said.
Despite the fact that Samsung no longer sells the model (old) phones targeted by the injunction request, Apple has argued in court documents that such an order is important to prevent Samsung from future copying of new products "not more colorably different" from the defunct models.
But Samsung argued that Apple was trying to target new Samsung phones in order to instil fear and uncertainty among carriers and retailers. Also Koh wrote that a consumer survey by Apple likely "inflated" the value that customers place on the patented Smartphone features in dispute.
"A multitude of other survey evidence not prepared for the purpose of litigation," Koh wrote, "indicates that numerous features that were not tested - such as battery life, MP3 player functionality, operating system, text messaging options, GPS, and processor speed - is highly important to consumers."
Apple must demonstrate more than an insignificant amount of lost sales due to Samsung's copying, and Apple's survey is "unpersuasive" evidence on that point.
The caveat: For the damages stemming from the 2012 jury finding of patent infringement, Koh recorded a final judgment against Samsung for $930 million, which is slightly lesser than the original amount of $1.05 billion. Samsung said it would appeal that decision.
Thursday's ruling comes ahead of another patent war set to kick off later this month involving newer Samsung phones. There seems to be no end to the patent war between Apple and Samsung.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Kristen Stewart Moving On With Nicholas Hoult, Jennifer Lawrence Dating Chris Martin – Reports [PHOTOS]
- Kate Middleton Suffocated in Kensington Palace, Queen Elizabeth Reported War With The Duchess [PHOTOS]
- Chris Martin Dating Reports: Jennifer Lawrence Vs Gwyneth Paltrow [PHOTOS]
- 9/11 Dust Cloud Most Likely Have Created Pregnancy Issues: Celebrities Who Posed Nude During Pregnancy
Join the Conversation
- Apple Inc. Stock Surge Observed as Hedge Funds 'Feasted' Ahead of iPhone 6 Launch
- Small Businesses Claim Positive Financial Situation but Negative on Outlook
- Perfume Maker Elizabeth Arden Blames Poor Q4 Financial Results on Justin Bieber Scent
- Companies Push Back IPO Plans Due to Mega Alibaba Share Launch
- Saudi Arabia: Brothers Beheaded For Smuggling Marijuana Into The Kingdom
- ISIS: More Journalists Beheading To Come After James Foley and Steven Sotloff [Video]
- Moto X+1 is Likely Nexus 6 Template; Motorola Shamu is 1st Android Silver with Snapdragon 810 – Reports
- James Foley’s Executioner Has British Accent—A Chilling Reminder That ISIS Has Foreign Members
- ISIS Posts Graphic Beheading Video of US Journalist James Foley
- iPhone 6 Release Date Remains On Course for Sept-Oct 2014 as Apple Delays iWatch Debut to 2015
- Nexus 6 Release Date Dilemma with Motorola Shamu Details Pointing to Better Smartphone and Killer Features