Subsidy-Free Nuclear Deal Questioned by Environmental Audit Committee
By Michael Klimes | October 24, 2013 5:10 AM EST
The British government's claim that any investment in nuclear power stations will not be borne by the taxpayer was met with scepticism at a public hearing of the Environmental Audit Committee.
A number of expert witnesses questioned on the topic of energy subsidies in the United Kingdom voiced their uncertainties about expanding the UK's nuclear power sector.
"This is a huge public contribution towards yesterday's energy thinking," said Alan Simpson, a former Labour MP.
Simpson compared the government's investment in nuclear energy to France's construction of the Maginot Line before the Second World War as a policy which required huge investment but ultimately failed.
"I just wonder what we are inhaling," he said.
The UK government and French utility company EDF Energy signed a £16bn deal that will see two new nuclear reactors built in Britain and the creation of 25,000 jobs.
The European pressurised water reactors, set to be constructed in Hinkley, Somerset, will be the first built in a generation.
The project will be financed by a group of companies, including the China General Nuclear Corporation (30-40%), EDF (45-50%) and Areva (10%).
Cleaning Up Nuclear Waste
MPs Caroline Lucas and Zac Goldsmith both made the point that nuclear power had hidden costs which could be defined as a subsidy, as the cost of something going wrong with nuclear power would be paid for by the taxpayer.
Goldsmith claimed that getting rid of nuclear waste could be a legacy that would be left for future generations to deal with.
Furthermore, Gordon Edge, director of policy at trade association Renewable UK said the government had "a bit of a mismatch" between its focus on developing nuclear power and other sources of renewable energy.
Keith Parker, chief executive of the Nuclear Industry Association repeated the government's line that the cost of investment in Britain's two new nuclear reactors would be shouldered by French and Chinese investors.
However, he said what Britain needed was a low carbon energy mix with nuclear forming a part of it.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Pope Francis Meets Sudanese Woman Who Was Spared Death for Apostasy (PHOTOS)
- Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17: King Williem-Alexander, Queen Maxima Hold Solemn Reception Ceremony for Victims
- Jennifer Lawrence & Nicholas Hoult Allegedly Split: Mad Max Actor Cheats with Kristen Stewart & Riley Keough - Reports
- Transfer News: FC Barcelona Shockingly Sign Valencia Defender [PHOTOS]
Join the Conversation
- Malaysia Airlines MH17: Multi-Million Pound Law Suit Looms Over Putin’s Head, Assets At Risk
- 5 Uncanny Jobs That Actually Pay Very Well
- Ebola Virus on the Loose: World Cautioned as Infection Moves; Global Airports on High Alert; Kills Liberian Doctor, Infects American Worker
- 5 Marketing Nuggets We Can All Learn From Lady Gaga
- Advisory: Britons Told to Leave Libya ASAP, UK Issues Travel Ban
- Apple iPhone 6 on Two Confirmed Release Dates, New Parts Leaked Suggesting Bigger iPhone to Come
- Google Nexus 6, 8 with Android L on Release Date Promises Killer Mobile Device Experience
- Xiaomi Mi4 vs OnePlusOne vs Nexus 5: Mi4 is the ‘Perfect’ Phone
- Israeli Women Stripping Naked for IDF Soldiers
- HTC One M8 Android 4.4.3 KitKat Update Roll Out, Introducing the HTC One Remix
- Shocking Video of Pedigree Dog Culling in Bali Emerges [Video]
- Sony Xperia Z3 Specs Leaked with More Killer Features Ahead of Samsung Galaxy Note 4, iPhone 6