Are The Boston Bombings Terrorist Attacks? It Depends On Your Definition
By Howard Koplowitz | April 16, 2013 9:35 AM EST
Are the Boston explosions terrorist attacks? It depends on your definition.
When he addressed the country around 6:15 p.m. EDT, President Barack Obama was criticized in some circles for not using the words “terrorism” or “terror” to describe the explosions that rocked Copley Square during the Boston Marathon Monday afternoon.
But just 15 minutes later, the Obama administration said the twin bombings were “acts of terror.”
During the presidential campaign, Obama was accused of being too slow to describe the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, as terrorism. What he said, and when, became an issue in his debates with Mitt Romney.
The definition of “terrorism” has changed since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, with the FBI and CIA having different criteria when labeling an event as terrorism.
The FBI defines “domestic terrorism” as “the unlawful use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States or Puerto Rico without foreign direction committed against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof in furtherance of political or social objectives.”
With much is unknown about the Boston bombings, it’s fair to say that this definition does not apply as yet.
But complicating matters even further is that the FBI has two separate definitions for “domestic terrorism” and a “terrorist incident.”
“A terrorist incident is a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, in violation of the criminal laws of the United States, or of any state, to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives,” according to the FBI report Terrorism 2002-2005.
Louis Klarevas, professor of international relations at New York University, tweeted that the Boston explosions can be categorized as terrorism under that definition.
But he said it’s too early to tell whether the bombings fall under the CIA definition.
According to the agency, the CIA definition of “terrorism” is “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents.”
Boston bombings don't meet CIA def of terrorism (b/c no political motive yet) but might meet FBI def (intimidate civilian population)
— Louis Klarevas (@Klarevas) April 15, 2013
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Taylor Swift Named Forbes' Second Highest Paid Country Musician [PHOTOS]
- Forever Lost: Indescribable Anguish for Malaysia Airlines MH17 Families, Remains of Some Victims May Never Be Found (PHOTOS)
- Global Aviation Accidents: UN to Form Safety Task Force, Gov'ts Should Share Intelligence Info to Avert Future Incidents on Flying Over Warzones (PHOTOS)
- PageSix: Beyonce & Jay Z Union is Not About Love, All About Business & the Brand
Join the Conversation
- Iran Leader Asks Muslims to Supply Arms to Palestine, Calls Israel ‘Rapacious Wolf’
- El Niño Update: 2014 Threat Easing, ‘Unlikely to be a Strong Event’ – Australia BoM
- “Women should not laugh in public” - Turkish Deputy PM says
- Opinion Poll in New Zealand Shows National Party Far Ahead in Popular Support
- Australia Asked National Media to Suppress Multi-National Corruption Case: WikiLeaks
- Samsung Galaxy S5 Alpha Leaks Online: Release Date, Five Features to Wait for New Smart Phone
- Photos of Motorola Moto X+1 Prototype and Specs Leak Online, Release Date, Four Fresh Features Revealed
- Sony Xperia Z3: Release Date, Five Features to Expect from New Android Smart Phone
- Freshly Leaked Apple iPad Air 2 Cases Confirm Touch ID Sensor; Release Date, Limited Specs and Price Listed
- Top Surprising Features Of iOS 8
- Top 4 Reasons Why iPhone 6 Will Hit Big Soon After its Sept 2014 Release Date
- Twin Malaysia Airlines MH370, MH17 Aviation Disasters Create Phobia Among Travellers