Clothing Retailer Cotton On Slapped with $1M Fine for Fire Hazard Children's Nightwear
By Esther Tanquintic-Misa | December 18, 2012 7:04 PM EST
Clothing retailer Cotton On has been slapped on Tuesday with a $1 million fine for selling highly combustible fire hazard children's nightwear.
The discount clothing retailer was ordered by Federal Court judge Richard Tracey to pay $400,000 for selling more than 1,000 nightwear that infringed Australian fire safety standards and another $400,000 for selling more than 1,000 unsafe pairs of girls' pyjamas. The sales of these items occurred between September and December 2010.
Mr Tracey further ordered Cotton On, which has more than 900 outlets across Australia, to pay $200,000 for the false and misleading labels on both sets of clothing items which claimed were ''low fire danger."
The order by Judge Tracey stipulates the fines must be settled within 15 months, along with a further $5,000 towards legal costs, following action by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
Children's nightwear sold by Cotton On Kids and a related company, Cotton On, have likewise been ordered by the court to be banned for four years unless it can churn out a written evidence from accredited fire-safety testers. The two companies were likewise directed to establish compliance programmes for three years; otherwise, its directors face jail time for non-compliance to the court orders.
Two years ago, the ACCC chanced upon the falsity of the item's fire hazard danger warnings.
"By supplying around 2500 unsafe children's nightdresses and pyjamas across Australia, Cotton On Kids Pty Ltd and Cotton On Clothing Pty Ltd breached the Australian mandatory standard for children's nightwear," Delia Rickard, ACCC deputy chair, said.
"The nightwear was so flammable that they should not have been supplied in Australia at all. To compound this, the highly flammable nightwear was misrepresented by being labelled 'low fire danger'."
Cotton On immediately had the items recalled.
The ACCC called on customers who had bought the items to return them so they may receive a full refund.
The nightwears involved in the court order were the Nicki Short Sleeve White/Petal Spot Nightdress and the Girls Short Sleeve Burst Pyjamas Pea Green.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Flight MH17 Attack: Russians Claim 'Putin A Terrorist,' Memorial at Dutch Embassy Overflows [PHOTOS]
- Typhoon Rammasun Claims 18 Lives in China, Incurs $4.32B Losses (PHOTOS)
- Ellen DeGeneres Caught Cheating with Mutual Friend Before Portia de Rossi’s Rehab – Reports [PHOTOS]
- Malaysia Airlines MH17: Vital Black Boxes Finally Land in Hands of Malaysian Authorities, Rebels Announce Ceasefire (PHOTOS/VIDEOS)
Join the Conversation
- China Military PLA Drills Affect Flights, Hundreds Cancelled
- Malaysia Airlines MH17: EU Feared Won't Ever Enforce Sanctions on Russia; All Talk, No Force
- U.S. Flights to Israel Now Lifted, Flights To and From Tel Aviv Resume – FAA
- Reserve Bank of New Zealand Raises Interest Rates Due to 'Unsustainable' Kiwi
- Embattled Malaysia Airlines Could Run Out of Cash 2015; Diverts Plane Over Another War Zone After MH17 Crash
- Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Apps Leak Online, Five Fresh Features to Expect from the Android Smartphone
- Moto 360 Price Speculations, Key Features, Strategic Release Date, Design: A Watch That is More Than Just Time
- Windows Phone 8.1 Update Rollout: 20 Nokia Lumia Phones Eligible and 13 New Features to be Added
- Three New Moto G Successors Spotted in FCC Document Dubbed Moto G2, Moto M and More --Reports
- iPad Air 2 Release Date Will Skip IGZO Panel; To Rollout with Super-Slim iPad Mini Air
- HTC Google Nexus 8 Release Date Imminent with New Nexus 7 Deals, Two New Tablets Soon
- Upcoming iPad Mini 3 Could be 30% Thinner and Likely be Called iPad Mini Air; Apple Q3 Results Show 9% Decrease in iPad Sales