Buses Using Microphone Surveillance To Monitor Commuters?
By VALLI MEENAKSHI RAMANATHAN | December 11, 2012 11:21 PM EST
Bus commuters across cities in the U.S. beware. Transit companies are increasingly investing in security systems that can actually record your conversations.
Well, if you happen to brush the news aside as you may have become accustomed to surveillance cameras found inside public transits, the new addition does indeed seem to infringe on privacy.
It appears that transit authorities are quietly engaging in the microphone-enabled surveillance that provides them with ability to record and store private conversations, Wired has reported.
Funded by the Department of Homeland Security in some instances, there is widespread installation of microphones that employ cables or WiFi to match audio conversation with camera images to produce synchronous recording, the Daily has stated.
Apparently, the publication is in possession of copies of contracts, procurement requests and other documents that appear to point to installation of such systems.
The news has raised serious concerns about security as the IP audio-video systems can be accessed remotely via a built-in web server, and can be employed with GPS data to track the movement of buses and passengers throughout the city.
In San Francisco, for instance, transit officials appear to have approved a $5.9 million contract for installation of new audio-enabled surveillance system on 357 buses and trolley cars over four years, with an option for 613 more vehicles. The contract, signed in July, specifies modern buses and historic trolley cars, according to the Daily.
Apparently, four and six camera/ microphone combinations are installed in each bus, giving transit authorities the ability to closely monitor passengers seated virtually anywhere, The Verge has indicated.
Bus companies seem to claim that the advanced surveillance systems offer users great level of security. But such a move has drawn resistance from civil liberty and privacy-minded groups, who insist that it is in violation of existing laws.
However, nothing seems to stop officials who are currently employing the technology in seven cities in the U.S.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Taylor Swift Named People's Best Dressed Stars Of 2014 [PHOTOS]
- Champions League Results: Barcelona Barely Escapes With A Win, Chelsea Fails To Hold On To The Lead [PHOTOS]
- Jeremy Lin, Kobe Bryant Among The Top 5 Overpaid Players In The NBA (Part 1 - Western Conference)
- Reasons Why Michael Jordan Is Better Than LeBron James [PHOTOS And VIDEO]
Join the Conversation
- Samsung Galaxy Note Edge: Top Reasons To Upgrade From Galaxy Note 3 Or Galaxy Note 2
- Android 5.0 L November And December Rollout: Android One, Nexus, Google Play, Galaxy S5, Galaxy Note 4
- 'Dragon Age: Inquisition' Warrior, Rogue, Mage Gameplay And Combat Strategies
- iOS 8 Bugs: Minor, Moderate And Serious Issues Why Users Should Not Upgrade Immediately
- ‘Assassin’s Creed Unity’ And ‘Rogue’ Updates: More Revealed For Co-Op, Collector’s Edition And Possible PC Debut
- Google Nexus 6 Release Date on Q4 2014 Confirmed by T-Mobile Featuring Wi-Fi Calling
- 2 Reasons Nexus 6 Release Date is Worth the Wait: Android L Data Encryption & Material Design
- Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs. BlackBerry Passport — Specifications, Features, Release Date And Price Showdown
- 3 Signs Apple iPhone 6 Could be in Short Supply Following its Sept 19 Release Date
- Australia Actively Rallying Support For International Coalition Against ISIS
- iOS 8 Jailbreak Release Update: Pangu Devs Will Outrace Evad3rs in Rollout of iPhone 6, iPad Unlocker
- Micromax Canvas A1 Vs Spice Dream Uno Vs Karbonn Sparkle V: A Choice On Which Android Is The Best