Buses Using Microphone Surveillance To Monitor Commuters?
By VALLI MEENAKSHI RAMANATHAN | December 11, 2012 11:21 PM EST
Bus commuters across cities in the U.S. beware. Transit companies are increasingly investing in security systems that can actually record your conversations.
Well, if you happen to brush the news aside as you may have become accustomed to surveillance cameras found inside public transits, the new addition does indeed seem to infringe on privacy.
It appears that transit authorities are quietly engaging in the microphone-enabled surveillance that provides them with ability to record and store private conversations, Wired has reported.
Funded by the Department of Homeland Security in some instances, there is widespread installation of microphones that employ cables or WiFi to match audio conversation with camera images to produce synchronous recording, the Daily has stated.
Apparently, the publication is in possession of copies of contracts, procurement requests and other documents that appear to point to installation of such systems.
The news has raised serious concerns about security as the IP audio-video systems can be accessed remotely via a built-in web server, and can be employed with GPS data to track the movement of buses and passengers throughout the city.
In San Francisco, for instance, transit officials appear to have approved a $5.9 million contract for installation of new audio-enabled surveillance system on 357 buses and trolley cars over four years, with an option for 613 more vehicles. The contract, signed in July, specifies modern buses and historic trolley cars, according to the Daily.
Apparently, four and six camera/ microphone combinations are installed in each bus, giving transit authorities the ability to closely monitor passengers seated virtually anywhere, The Verge has indicated.
Bus companies seem to claim that the advanced surveillance systems offer users great level of security. But such a move has drawn resistance from civil liberty and privacy-minded groups, who insist that it is in violation of existing laws.
However, nothing seems to stop officials who are currently employing the technology in seven cities in the U.S.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Prince William And Kate Middleton Complete NYC Tour Itinerary [PHOTOS]
- G20 Summit Awkward Moments: Putin Yawns, Mystery Bubbles Appear, F18 Drama Ensues
- Real Life ‘Frozen’: Snow Overwhelms The US, Kills 7; More To Come (Pictures)
- Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt in Sydney for ‘Unbroken’ Red Carpet Premiere [PHOTOS]
Join the Conversation
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Useful Tips For Moto X And Moto G: Lock Screen Notifications, Quick Settings And Privacy
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Tips For LG Nexus 5: Notifications, Accessibility, Privacy And Saving Battery
- Android 5.0 Lollipop List Of Bugs And Ways To Resolve On Nexus 5, Nexus 7 And Nexus 9
- Samsung Galaxy S6, Galaxy Note 5 And Sony Xperia Z4: Top Things Unveiled So Far
- iPhone 8 Speculation: Exciting Big Leap From The iPhone 6
- Walmart Early Price Matching Special Event On Nov. 21, 2014 Matches Its Competitors' Black Friday 2014 Prices And Includes Exclusive Deals For Samsung LED HDTVs And iPad Air 2 [WATCH VIDEO]
- Microsoft Band Wearable Gadget At $199 Is A Sell-Out
- 6 Big Reasons iPhone 6 Plus is Must-Have Black Friday, Christmas 2014 Buy
- NATO To Russia: 'Pull Back Your Troops'
- US Plane Flying Over Russian Skies Spotted; Vladimir Putin Ready For 'Practical Cooperation' With US
- Nexus 6 Release Date And Price Under AT&T, T-Mobile And Sprint Listed
- Germany, Not U.S., Is The World’s Favorite Country; UK, Canada, Australia Maintain Top 10 Spots