Court Deals New Setback To Pennsylvania Voter ID Law
By Jeremy B. White | September 19, 2012 4:47 AM EST
The new law tightens requirements about what types of identification Pennsylvanians can present before being allowed to vote: Whereas before Pennsylvania residents could use non-photographic documents like a utility bill, now they must have government-sanctioned photo IDs. Critics say the law will disenfranchise poor and minority voters, who are less likely to have proper identification.
A Pennsylvania judge upheld the law in August, leading plaintiffs to appeal to the state's highest court. In a 4-2 vote on Tuesday, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered the lower Commonwealth Court to determine whether voters have trouble getting the required identification.
If the lower court finds that the process of obtaining a new ID isn't too much of a burden, the Supreme Court said, the voting law should stand. But if it is prohibitively difficult to get identification -- in other words, if the risk of Pennsylvanians being unable to vote is too high -- the Supreme Court said the law should be struck down.
"Both state agencies involved appreciate that some registered voters have been and will be unable to comply with the requirements," the court decision reads, noting that voters are generally required to present a birth certificate, social security card and two additional forms of documentation proving Pennsylvania residence.
Noting that "the population involved includes members of some of the most vulnerable segments of our society (the elderly, disabled members of our community, and the financially disadvantaged)," the court warned of "a disconnect between what the Law prescribes and how it is being implemented."
If the Commonwealth Court finds sufficient risk of disenfranchisement, the decision says, it is "obliged to enter a preliminary injunction" blocking the voter ID requirement from taking effect.
The legal challenge has taken on immense significance given Pennsylvania's pivotal role as a battleground state in presidential elections. While Mitt Romney's campaign has quietly sent signals that the state may be out of reach, independent groups favoring Romney have spent heavily there in hopes of securing its 20 electoral votes.
Similar battles have played out state by state across the country, pitting proponents of new laws allegedly designed to prevent fraud at the polls against voting rights advocates who warn of a concerted attempt to suppress certain groups of voters.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Forever Lost: Indescribable Anguish for Malaysia Airlines MH17 Families, Remains of Some Victims May Never Be Found (PHOTOS)
- Global Aviation Accidents: UN to Form Safety Task Force, Gov'ts Should Share Intelligence Info to Avert Future Incidents on Flying Over Warzones (PHOTOS)
- Celebrities Who Got Pregnant Using IVF: Busting the Myths About IVF
- Lunch with the Gods: Pope Francis Eats with Vatican Workers in Cafeteria
Join the Conversation
- MH17: Separatist Soldier Holds Aussie Reporter at Gun Point
- Australia Asked National Media to Suppress Multi-National Corruption Case: WikiLeaks
- UK Asks NATO to Stand Up to Russia
- U.S. ‘Defends’ Israel for ‘Disgraceful’ Attack on UN School in Gaza that Killed 15
- Gold in China: 127-Tonne Gold Reserves Tapped in Xinjiang
- Apple iPhone 6 Release Date Update: 6 Most Wanted Feature Upgrades for Next iPhone
- Moto X Android 4.4.4 KitKat Update Guide: Schedule and How to Install
- Top 4 Reasons Why iPhone 6 Will Hit Big Soon After its Sept 2014 Release Date
- Top Surprising Features Of iOS 8
- Twin Malaysia Airlines MH370, MH17 Aviation Disasters Create Phobia Among Travellers
- HTC One M8 Windows Phone to Launch for Verizon; Release Date, Price, Five Fresh Features to Anticipate for New Smartphone
- OnePlus One vs. Moto X+1 – Early Specifications, Release Date and Price Faceoff