Obama Administration Scores Point In Fight To Keep Indefinite Detention Powers
By Jeremy B. White | September 19, 2012 1:37 AM EST
Acting at the behest of the Obama administration, a federal judge has halted a recent court ruling that sharply questioned the federal government's power to indefinitely detain terror suspects.
At issue is a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 that empowered the government to detain without trial people who "substantially" or "directly" supported the orchestrators of the Sept. 11 attacks or "associated forces." Southern District of New York Judge Katherine Forrest ruled against that provision earlier this week, siding with a group of journalists and activists who said the law gave them credible fear that they could be held indefinitely.
The section in the NDAA was ambiguously worded and provoked an impassioned debate on the Senate floor, where lawmakers argued over whether the law allowed the government to strip legal protections from American citizens captured on U.S. soil. Ultimately, Congress deferred to the Obama administration.
In the decade since Sept. 11, the government has detained scores of terrorism suspects without charging them with a crime. The authority to do so stems from an Authorization for the Use of Military Force, or AUMF, passed by Congress shortly after the twin towers fell.
According to the Obama administration, the National Defense Authorization Act merely affirms detention powers the government already wields. But Judge Forrest disagreed, writing in her decision that the new law enshrines "broader detention authority than was provided in the AUMF in 2001" and was written "to try to ratify past detentions, which may have occurred under an overly broad interpretation of the AUMF."
The administration quickly condemned Forrest's decision, saying it severely undercut operations against the Taliban and Al Qaeda abroad. The ruling "threatens irreparable harm to national security and the public interest by injecting added burdens and dangerous confusion into the conduct of military operations abroad during an active armed conflict," administration officials wrote in a court filing.
Officials asked for an interim stay on Judge Forrest's order. A Second Circuit court of appeals judge granted that request on Tuesday. The issue is now scheduled to go before a hearing on Sept. 28.
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Flight MH17 Attack: Russians Claim 'Putin A Terrorist,' Memorial at Dutch Embassy Overflows [PHOTOS]
- Pope Francis Meets Sudanese Woman Who Was Spared Death for Apostasy (PHOTOS)
- Ellen DeGeneres Caught Cheating with Mutual Friend Before Portia de Rossi’s Rehab – Reports [PHOTOS]
- Typhoon Matmo Leaves 32k Customers w/o Electricity in Taiwan, Weakens After Landing in China
Join the Conversation
- Ideological Support Swells for Scottish Independence
- Malaysia Airlines MH17: Dutch Wants Putin's Daughter Maria Deported to Russia From Holland
- New Zealand and China Decide to Boost Defence Ties
- Gaza Crisis: 695 Dead & 4,500 Injured, UN Accuses Israel of War Crimes
- 3 Almost Believable Internet Theories on the Malaysia Airlines MH17 Crash
- Windows Phone 8.1 Update Rollout: 20 Nokia Lumia Phones Eligible and 13 New Features to be Added
- HTC Google Nexus 8 Release Date Imminent with New Nexus 7 Deals, Two New Tablets Soon
- iPad Air 2 Release Date Will Skip IGZO Panel; To Rollout with Super-Slim iPad Mini Air
- HTC One E8 (Plastic Variant of HTC One M8) with 5-Inch Display, Dual-SIM, 801 Processor and 2 GB RAM to Hit New Markets Soon
- iPhone 6 Release Date in September 26 with Price Details and More Killer Features
- Apple iPad Mini Air: Three Fresh Features on the Smart Tablet to Wait for
- 4.7-Inch iPhone 6 Release Date is Sept 26 after iOS 8 GM Public Debut on Sept 17 – Reports