Judge Fights Back Against Obama's Supreme Court Remarks -- With Homework
By Dan Rivoli | April 5, 2012 7:06 AM EST
A federal judge is retaliating against what he says was an inappropriate comment on the judiciary by President Barack Obama, and he is doing so with an unusual tactic: he assigned administration lawyers to do homework.
Smith gave lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice something of a homework assignment: submit a three-page, single-spaced legal brief outlining the Department's stance on "judicial review," a well-established legal doctrine since the early 1800s, with specific references to presidents' remarks.
The judge issued the order on Tuesday, in a separate health care law challenge from physician-owned hospitals, and was a clear consequence of remarks Obama made Monday about Supreme Court justices taking an "unprecedented, extraordinary step" if they overturned the 2010 health care law.
Recognizing that the Supreme Court does throw out Congress' laws, Obama Tuesday clarified his remarks by saying the justices stopped overturning major economic laws, like the Affordable Care Act, at the end of the New Deal in the 1930s.
But Obama's more pointed comments from Monday stuck with Judge Smith, who was appointed in the 1980s by President Ronald Reagan.
The legal brief due Thursday must include the administration and Justice Department's stance on "judicial review" and the judiciary's authority to strike down a law as unconstitutional, a power established in the landmark 1803 decision Marbury v. Madison.
"Does the Department of Justice recognize that federal courts have the authority in appropriate circumstances to strike federal statutes because of one or more constitutional infirmities," Smith asked, according to CBS.
"I'm referring to statements by the president in past few days to the effect, and I'm sure you've heard about them, that it is somehow inappropriate for what he termed 'unelected' judges to strike acts of Congress that have enjoyed -- he was referring to, of course, Obamacare -- what he termed broad consensus in majorities in both houses of Congress," Smith continued.
The statement Obama made referred to "conservative commentators" who have long railed against what they call "judicial activism" from the bench.
But coming from a president, Smith felt the remarks "troubled a number of people who have read it as somehow a challenge to the federal courts ... or the appropriateness of the concept of judicial review."
To contact the editor, e-mail:
Most Popular Slideshows
- Taylor Swift Named Forbes' Second Highest Paid Country Musician [PHOTOS]
- Forever Lost: Indescribable Anguish for Malaysia Airlines MH17 Families, Remains of Some Victims May Never Be Found (PHOTOS)
- Global Aviation Accidents: UN to Form Safety Task Force, Gov'ts Should Share Intelligence Info to Avert Future Incidents on Flying Over Warzones (PHOTOS)
- PageSix: Beyonce & Jay Z Union is Not About Love, All About Business & the Brand
Join the Conversation
- Iran Leader Asks Muslims to Supply Arms to Palestine, Calls Israel ‘Rapacious Wolf’
- Australia Asked National Media to Suppress Multi-National Corruption Case: WikiLeaks
- El Niño Update: 2014 Threat Easing, ‘Unlikely to be a Strong Event’ – Australia BoM
- “Women should not laugh in public” - Turkish Deputy PM says
- Opinion Poll in New Zealand Shows National Party Far Ahead in Popular Support
- Samsung Galaxy S5 Alpha Leaks Online: Release Date, Five Features to Wait for New Smart Phone
- Freshly Leaked Apple iPad Air 2 Cases Confirm Touch ID Sensor; Release Date, Limited Specs and Price Listed
- Moto X Android 4.4.4 KitKat Update Guide: Schedule and How to Install
- Photos of Motorola Moto X+1 Prototype and Specs Leak Online, Release Date, Four Fresh Features Revealed
- Sony Xperia Z3: Release Date, Five Features to Expect from New Android Smart Phone
- Top 4 Reasons Why iPhone 6 Will Hit Big Soon After its Sept 2014 Release Date
- Top Surprising Features Of iOS 8